The Progressive Union of Prosecutors, in which the current Attorney General exercised the spokesman, hardly loads against the decision of the Supreme Court to send Álvaro García Ortiz to trial for the filtration of an email of the couple of Isabel Díaz Ayuso. Speaking to Eldiario.es, his current Felix Martín González spokesman understands that the Appeals Chamber “supports an argument of the instructor magistrate that is merely speculative and subjective.” They also celebrate that Pilar Rodríguez, provincial prosecutor of Madrid and linked to the association, has been out of the future trial.
The Appeals Chamber of the Supreme Court, which has supervised all the investigation and has endorsed almost all the decisions of Judge Ángel Hurtado, issued a car that marked the future of the trial. The magistrates filed the cause definitively against Pilar Rodríguez and endorsed that the process remains only against the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz. A car that, for the first time in almost a year, partially revoked a relevant decision of Hurtado – the processing car, the most relevant of the case – and had a particular vote of a magistrate who opted to also exonerate the attorney general.
Martín, current spokesman for the association to which the Attorney General was affiliated until he is appointed and that he has two representatives in the Fiscal Council, believes that the Chamber has given its guarantee to “an argumentation of the instructor magistrate that is merely speculative and subjective”. They understand, like the particular vote, that Hurtado has focused their efforts on investigating the two prosecutors when that mail with the confession of Alberto González Amador was in the hands of many more people.
“It seems that he is endorsing that, as for the instructor magistrate, an alternative, according to his subjective valuations, is the authorship of the attorney general of that revelation, with that enough, and we understand that he is manifestly insufficient,” he regrets after knowing a car that leaves García Ortiz at the edge of judgment with some accusations asking for up to six years in jail for him.
This association ensures that they are “optimistic” and trust in the particular vote of magistrate Andrés Palomo who clearly opposes the prosecution of the attorney general. “It is written in a very forceful way, it is saying that there is not a single indication and that the investigation has focused on investigating two people, when there was a potential circle of possible developers much larger and when focusing only on them two unbridled the vision of the instruction,” explains the UPF spokesman.
The association affects opposing the reasoning of the car and the vote on the deletion of messages on the Attorney General's telephone. A deletion that from the Prosecutor's Office attributed to a usual security measure and that was made once it was made public that the cause had opened against him in the Supreme. “It cannot become an indication against him because, in addition, the attorney general has a duty of custody of the very relevant information.” That García Ortiz “protects his communications,” says the UPF spokesman, “it is something of the authority and information it has. Deletion is not an indication.”
Several judicial and fiscal associations have requested that García Ortiz Value the option to resign before the opening of oral trial. “That the constitutional impact that may be to continue in office ponders carefully,” says the Francisco de Vitoria Judicial Association. The professional and independent association of prosecutors, who exercises the accusation in the case, has asked Judge Hurtado to suspend García Ortiz in office when he opens an oral trial against him. Other associations, such as the majority and conservative Association of Prosecutors, have been asking for months asking for the resignation of the Attorney General.
The “divided heart”
The order of the Appeals Chamber confirms that García Ortiz will be judged as soon as Hurtado dictates the opening of oral trial against him, but corrects the instructor and leaves Pilar Rodríguez, provincial prosecutor of Madrid, considered by the magistrate from the beginning as an indispensable part of the filtration. “We have the divided heart, it would be the correct expression,” they say from the UPF before celebrating the final file of the cause against Rodríguez, for whom some accusations also ask for jail.
“We were very worried that a trial was opened against Pilar, who is a professional like the cup of a pine, and very happy that he has been left out,” celebrates Félix Martín González. It emphasizes that the free and not only provisional dismissal against it has been agreed: “It is important because it clears any stretch of doubt in the internal mechanism of accounting of account.”
The car, unanimously by the three magistrates of the Chamber, understands that Rodriguez sent to the attorney general all the information of the Ayuso couple fulfilling a dation of accounts, a regulated method within the Prosecutor's Office to transfer information, and does not execute an illegal filtration. “That a boss asks you to explain something or give you an order that you understand legitimate and resolve what you ask, that cannot take any criminal responsibility,” the UPF celebrates.
It also invites you to make a “reflection” because several accusations, including the Professional and Independent Association of Prosecutors (APIF) have requested jail for Rodríguez. “The only thing he did was attend an order from his superiors that, however, has deserved that an association of prosecutors ask for prison penalty against her, that deserves a very great reflection in the fiscal race, that the judges have had to come to endorse this action.”
