It was a matter of time. You just had to wait for Judge Juan Carlos Peinado to not hold the pressure and decide to launch through the window of his court. He did it on Tuesday and the result was embarrassing. In his Fishing expedition With which trying to find material to take Begoña Gómez to trial, he thought he had enough to catch a much larger marine monster. The Great White Haly Whale has become a member of the Government, the Minister of Justice, Félix Bolaños. He has communicated it to the Supreme Court, who will have to find a way to reject his crazy idea without calling him insane.
Hajinado aims for the Supreme to initiate a cause against Bolaños, which is afrado, which he accuses of the crimes of embezzlement of public funds and false testimony. All on account of the appointment of Cristina Álvarez as an assistant of the wife of the president of the Government, a position that already existed in Moncloa with previous governments. To verify to what extent he has again confused his wishes with reality, it should be noted that the tweet judges of the right who usually receive their cars with ferrets and brave kept a respectful silence this time and that the Popular Party did not threw himself into the street to ask for the minister's head.
“We are going to be prudent,” said Alberto Núñez Feijóo when asked about the issue, and wait for the Supreme decision. It has been a long time since the last time Feijóo appealed to prudence in relation to an accusation to a government member. For all that of the presumption of innocence. His parliamentary spokesman, Miguel Tellado, remained in the same line: “We should not advance” to what the Supreme decides. The never seen with Tellado. In the PP, it is enough to declare a witness with a buccanero to issue a sentence, appeal and entry into prison.
The minister waited in the afternoon to give his opinion. He chose to put a good face and show some disdain by the judge, always not very aggressive. “I have absolute peace of mind,” Bolaños said in Congress. He was very happy that the Supreme Court, which he called “a professional court”, will take care of the matter, because he is sure he will make “a fair decision.” By calling the Supreme “professional,” I was almost implied that hairstyle is just an amateur at more than 70 years. He affirmed that the judge's car “contains lump errors.” To questions from journalists, he said that “it does not correspond to me to say if Judge Peinado is prevailing.”
The judge turned the interrogation of Bolaños in April into a siege with the intention of self -government for the appointment of the advisor. It happened in Moncloa and had the usual rock situations in the magistrate. He demanded that they look for a platform to be in a position superior to that of Bolaños: “It cannot be that I am lower than the witness.” He demonstrated his ignorance of the Administration by stating that he considered strange that for the election of an eventual position of free disposition – a person of political trust – no type of evidence was held, as is done in the oppositions to officials. The conversation was tense and the judge bothered when Bolaños sketch a smile.
The minister declared as a witness. On other occasions, the judge has called to declare as accused of people who had previously summoned as witnesses, when they are obliged to tell the truth. It is a rare practice, because it can cause a situation of helplessness to the accused when it is done systematically. At the time, the audience of Madrid forced him to lift the imputation to two people who had gone through that situation, Juan José Güemes and Joaquín Goyache, rector of the Complutense.
There is an element that is not the first time that it occurs in the instruction that combats. The judge misrepresent a part of the interrogation. I wanted to know who had proposed the appointment of Cristina Álvarez. As Bolaños said that it is usually the superior of the hired person who has done such a thing, sent him to find out who that person was. Bolaños returned with a name. In the car, hairstyle writes that “the witness said that the person who had made the appointment (…) was Raúl Díaz Silva.” That is false, because it is not what I had asked. Díaz Silva told the judge that he did not know who had chosen the advisor.
Hairstyle cannot impute Bolaños, being aggroid, and is obliged to pass the decision to the Supreme. That does not prevent him from calling him “investigated” on numerous occasions in the car, to which he is not entitled in theory. He is saving Spain with what cannot be with nonsense just because the law says that he cannot do something.
The car includes a more delusional element, but that is not the only responsibility of the judge. Bolaños had declared that he had only coincided with the advisor three times. According to the car, “the last one was in the funeral home for the death of Mrs. Begoña Gómez.” There is combing the wrong text of the transcription of the interrogation signed by the lawyer of the administration of justice. It is likely to refer to the death of Gomez's father in June 2024.
It does not seem speculative to affirm that it was Begoña Gómez who chose the person who would do the advisor functions and that the appointment was made by the person who had the function of formalizing the hiring. But as Bolaños was then Secretary General of the Presidency and today he is Minister, Hajinado believed that he had a piece of major hunting at his disposal.
Jaleado by the PP and the right -wing press despite the lean results of its instruction, hairstyle has not achieved a large booty in fifteen months of instruction. He has not tried at the indiciar level that Gomez obtained an undue economic benefit of his collaboration with the Complutense University, which would have led to the imputation of some positions of the university center.
He has not proven that Gomez will register in his name in the patent registry and for his personal benefit a software designed by collaborating companies for their future free use. He has not proven that the Complutense would give him a favor treatment in exchange for consideration to direct one of the more than fifty chairs in the center, which did not turn Gomez into a professor. He has not proven that Gomez's intervention was decisive for Air Europa to receive public credits that saved it from bankruptcy.
What he has achieved is that the status of the president's wife has been part of the usual accusations of the opposition to Sánchez. Unlike the case of Isabel Díaz Ayuso's boyfriend that they have not seen any involvement that affects the president of Madrid, Gomez's judicial situation has been a basic component of the complaints against her husband. Feijóo remembers in Congress, almost routinely, that Sánchez has charged with his wife. And that the highest economic amount perceived in a year for it was almost 15,000 euros, an amount similar to the minimum wage of that year.
Hairy never disappoints those looking for headlines. In his brief, he comes to threaten in an veiled way with ordering a registration of Moncloa to find “the document in which the appointment of Cristina Álvarez is proposed.” Immediately, it states that it would be a disproportionate initiative “for now.” It may be the letter you keep to continue having prominence. If the supreme tells him that there are no reasons to impute Bolaños, we may see him one day hitting the access door to Moncloa and asking them to put the stage again.
