685acd83e4eb4.jpeg


It is clear that a dismissal is never a good receipt news by a worker and even more so if said dismissal by the employee has been made in an inadmissible way, which entails a judicial mess by the worker.

At the moment, the issue has focused on whether the amount that said worker who has been fired in the inadmissible is sufficient or not, as established in article 56 of the Workers' Statute.

In this, the Supreme Court has a very important role, which must rule on this issue of vital importance for employees. It should be remembered that this agency already showed its point of view with a ruling that showed that compensation for unfair dismissal It could not be increased by judicial paths.

The Supreme Court could open the door to greater compensation in cases where the worker's damage is not covered

However, the matter is that the courts of our country could now grant a greater amount for such unfair dismissal in cases where such economic amount Do not cover and repair the damage that said worker could have suffered for said dismissal.

Courtroom

Courtroom

This opens the door for the system to be more flexible, since different circumstances would be assess, as the act of the age of the farewell or if, failing that, it belongs to a disadvantaged or vulnerable group.

Although it is worth mentioning that, as the country has had access, the Prosecutor's Office would not agree with said increase, by establishing that said increase in compensation for disproven dismissal would be closed “except for exceptional cases where other elements that justify additional compensation for damages and damages, which would go by another legal route and not as a complement to compensation for inadmissibility. ” So they show their rejection of the resource of a worker in a judicial process for this reason.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *