The couple of the president of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, has taken the final step for the State Attorney General to feel on the bench for the filtration of an email of her lawyer: to present her accusation brief. In the document Alberto González Amador officially asks for four years in prison for Álvaro García Ortiz accusing him both and the Madrid prosecutor to urged a plan for the media to publish their confession of fiscal fraud. The defense of the businessman omits in his brief, key to being the alleged victim of crime, details such as that he himself spent an email from the prosecution to Miguel Ángel Rodríguez or that his lawyer sent his confession to a state lawyer and not only the prosecutor Julián Salto.
Judge Ángel Hurtado closed the investigation after eight months of cause with a passage of pass to abbreviated procedure that, in practice, leaves the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, and the provincial prosecutor of Madrid, Pilar Rodríguez, on the edge of trial. The accusation writings have arrived in Cascada, with the Professional and Independent Association of Prosecutors (APIF) asking for six years in jail for García Ortiz and Clean hands claiming four years after limiting themselves to copying and hitting the Hurtado car in their own brief.
González Amador's lawyer insists on the story that the Civil Guard (UCO) of the Civil Guard will break down in a report the content of Pilar Rodríguez's telephone. A “Fortuny team”, in reference to the headquarters of the Attorney General's Office in that street in Madrid, agreed first to collect the information of his case and already on the night of March 13, 2024 to filter his confession to the press and counteract news that, although false, favored the public story of Alberto González Amador and his partner: that the Prosecutor's Office had ruled out a silent pact to drag him for a long judicial process.
“The facts are of such radicality, that everyone had in their hands the email of February 2, 2024 and its literal content before Alberto González Amador,” regrets his defense to denounce the “criminal plan” that led him to be called “publicly” things as “confessed fraud.” And as it has been denouncing for more than a year, he adds that everything is to politically harm the president of the Community of Madrid.
The writing of the Ayuso couple, which essentially fits as a glove in Hurtado's car, omits relevant details that he has not recognized but has been outlined for eight months of investigation. The first is that if he did not know the email with his own confession is because, as he has recognized himself, his lawyer had not told him. By the time he transcended the media on the night of March 13, 2024 that mail had been in the entrance tray of prosecutor Julián Salto for a month and 11 days.
It was one of the great revelations of González Amador's testimony and his lawyer Carlos Neira in the Supreme Court. The businessman learned of the radio that he had confessed a fiscal fraud of 350,000 euros although he, said several times before Judge Hurtado in different ways, had never given his approval or consent to confess anything. His lawyer Neira, who detailed the rappe that took his client that day, clarified that he did explain to González Amador that he was going to seek compliance and that involved recognizing crimes. “How do you not let me know!” He came to reproach him.
The lawyer explained to the judge that he did not consulted with the businessman the specific content of his confession and did not send him the mail he had already sent to the Prosecutor's Office and the State Advocacy. The lament that on March 13, 2024 he learned of the press of his confession, therefore, is also related to this alleged lack of communication between lawyer and client that the writing writing.
The Hurtado Judge was very surprised during the testimony with this matter and came to ask González Amador if after the sainete he maintained his confidence in Carlos Neira as a lawyer, to which the businessman answered affirmatively. But the processing car does not collect this circumstance that the Prosecutor's Office and the defenses consider key: they question that a confession not endorsed by González Amador can be considered a confidential email.
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez's filtration
Judge Ángel Hurtado has never considered the role played by Miguel Ángel Rodríguez played throughout the case. He was the first to circulate the false information of March 13, 2024 that published several media and that triggered the internal movements of the Prosecutor's Office to make a statement. After a few minutes of the seven in the afternoon of that day, before what he recognized before the judge, the chief of the cabinet of Ayuso already spread that the Prosecutor's Office had offered and withdraw a pact to the businessman by orders “from above.”
The investigation has shown that González Amador himself sent him a message from his lawyer and an email by prosecutor Julián Salto on the morning of March 12, shortly after Eldiario.es revealed his fiscal fraud case. Miguel Ángel Rodríguez leaked that prosecutor's email to the press a day and a half later, spreading a version of the events that he knew was false, although he has always claimed to ignore that there was previously an email from González Amador's lawyer confessing his crimes.
This extreme was not considered relevant by Judge Hurtado, who dispatched revelation as an “authorized dissemination” by the businessman, and is not reflected in the accusation brief of González Amador. For the Attorney General, the Provincial Prosecutor and the Prosecutor's Office itself is a key fact, since according to their criteria it makes it clear that the first to disseminate their secrets and confidential emails was González Amador himself to people who had nothing to do with the judicial process. At that time, he says, for example, the attorney general, “these information lose their reserved character and its owner loses, therefore, the right to not spread.”
González Amador's accusation brief also omits one of the data that were revealed during the investigation. His lawyer Carlos Neira not only sent his confession to the prosecutor Julián Salto on February 2, 2024. That same day he also sent him to a state lawyer, detail that the defender of the businessman had never revealed to a court in a case that deals, precisely, about revelation of secrets. His goal was to track a pact a month before the complaint was filed.
The “confessed fraud” and the 300,000 euros
González Amador and his defense also regret in several points of his accusation brief such as the revelation of his confession and his cause of fiscal fraud – for which he is already prosecuted for trial – that several politicians and journalists have referred to him as “fraudsman” or “confessed criminal.” A matter of extreme relevance to the businessman: his lawyer has come to exhibit several witnesses that have written on the social network X on this matter and he has demanded two dozens of people, including the president of the Government, asking for almost half a million euros in compensation.
His argument is accompanied by a request of 300,000 euros of compensation by criminal proceedings, explaining that he must leave the pocket of prosecutors, and not of the Prosecutor's Office in a subsidiary. What does not explain this letter is that another room of the Supreme Court, that of the civil, has already explained that it is a political criticism that the businessman is obliged to endure, although he has not become a public character by his own decision.
The accusation brief is the story that each of the parties leads to the trial and that of Alberto González Amador makes it clear that the businessman has no intention of developing all these points that, according to the Prosecutor's Office and the defenses, weaken their version of the facts. Some points that, in addition, the Hurtado Judge has never considered relevant, but that the Criminal Chamber that predicts the case will have to analyze.
