The defense of the businessman Alberto González Amador, a partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, has resorted to the Provincial Court of Madrid the denial of the practice of proceedings in the case in which he has been prosecuted for the alleged commission of two crimes against the Public Treasury in competition with a crime of documentary falsehood.
In a brief filed before the Court of Instruction number 19 of Madrid, to which Europa Press had access, the lawyers file an appeal against the order issued on May 28 for which the Immaculate Judge Iglesias – whose judge has assumed Judge Antonio Viejo – declared there to be no place to the practice of certain proceedings. The defense of the businessman and commission claim that the new instructor of the case interrogates two witnesses and admits an expert report.
In his opinion, these proceedings would shed light on invoices related to alleged professional services provided in Mexico and Ivory Coast. According to the defense, the testimony would demonstrate that “if these invoices respond to really existing services and they cannot be considered false, it would not be possible to consider the concurrence of fiscal crime.” “Secondly, that if even for hypothetical or dialectical purposes, both false invoices were considered, the adjustments not made and that should have been practiced by the Tax Agency in the Tax Liquidation would objectively impossible to consider the concurrence of fiscal crime,” he says.
González Amador's lawyers insist that it is “necessary” incorporated into the summary ”.
“The refusal that integrates the resolutions that are resorted to the practice of the only three proposed defense proceedings constitutes the continuation in the absolute destruction and disappearance of the fundamental rights to defense and the presumption of innocence of Alberto González Amador, until the disappearance of any content,” censorship.
