“Black biennium.” It is the alternative balance made by Alberto Núñez Feijóo on the political course of the government before the summer break. In a press appearance, the president of the PP has advanced that he will present a battery with the “Sanchist” measures that he wants to repeal, has assured that the Executive does not deserve his support and has defended that he is ready for elections that do not know when they will arrive and that in his opinion they only depend on the parliamentary partners.
“Our obligation is to be prepared for the moment when the partners say 'it's over,” said the opposition leader, who wanted to close the course a few days after the president of the Government, Pedro Sánchez, who made his own balance last Monday in La Moncloa. That balance, according to Feijóo, has not occurred since there has been no debate on the state of the nation, a project of general state budgets and neither an early call for elections.
Feijóo says that “nobody expects anything from this legislature, except for the end date.” Although he acknowledges that he does not know if the Government will last a few months or will complete its mandate until 2027. Sánchez does not know, but its parliamentary partners who at different times of this legislature have called to support a motion of censure that however does not encourage to formally present.
One of the main messages he has defended in his speech is that his party, whatever happens, is prepared for those possible elections. “Sánchez does not know when there will be elections because it does not depend on him. We do not know when there will be elections but our commitment is to be prepared. What I do know is that our obligation is to be prepared for the moment when the partners say it is over,” he insisted.
Feijóo has also insisted that as of September he will submit a proposal with the laws he intends to repeal if he arrives at the government. “All those that suppose an outrage against equality such as amnesty or the law of separatist quotas,” he said about the law for singular financing for Catalonia that the Government has launched but that is not even presented in Congress. He has also assured that he will reverse the reform of the crimes of embezzlement and that he will convert the Law of Democratic Memory into a so -called Concordia Law, such as that they have already approved some of their autonomous governments with the support of Vox.
As usual in his speeches, the leader of the PP has loaded against the Government for the cases of corruption that dotted him and has been used for this news without contrast by ensuring that the president “has lived with brothels in the family economy”, as he already did during the last appearance of Sánchez in Congress, in reference to the saunas run by his father -in -law and from which he emerged in 2006.
Although there is no proof that those saunas were brothels, the PP has made this one of its usual attacks on Sanchez in recent months. The origin of some of these information is the police sewer launched by the Rajoy government, when José Manuel Villarejo met with the then Secretary of State of Interior, Francisco Martínez, and provided the data of the alleged businesses of the father -in -law of Sánchez.
“Who came to wave the feminist flag removing that legitimacy to the rest of the world has turned out to be surrounded by macho. Sanchismo is machismo,” he said. “His government paid prostitutes with public money. Prostitution is a constant in all cases around him,” the PP leader insisted.
A government like this, according to its diagnosis, does not deserve the support of its party. “All priorities go to search for agreements with separatist parties or with the radical left,” he complained. And has conditioned its support to the laws of the Executive in Congress to unlock their own initiatives. “We support him if he lets us debate the laws we have presented. There are more than 30 laws blocked in Congress and laws with more than 50 extensions (of the term of amendments),” he said to talk about an alleged “of doubtful legality.” “Perhaps it should be elucidated and that the courts tell us if it is according to the right that the table blocks the initiatives approved in the other Chamber,” he said.