The decision of Single Competition Judge of not granting the postponement of the meeting between the Real Madrid y Health next Tuesday, August 19 in the Santiago Bernabéuhas caused great discomfort, not only in the white team, but also in the AFEwhose president, David AganzoHe believes that the players are at risk.
In an interview with the newspaper ‘As’, Aganzo ensures that “it is an issue that transcends the regulatory framework of sport because the health of the players is put at risk. This is collected by the Sports Law And so the Workers Statute. The players are soccer workers and makes no sense to force a situation in which their health is put at risk, “he insisted.
And he added that “we warn that yes Real Madrid o Atlético passed to the final phase of FIFA Club World Cup The Collective agreement, that collects the 21 consecutive days of vacation and, in turn, respect the physical preparation of the players without putting their health at risk. That is why we talk to the captains of both teams to establish a minimum agreement that LaLiga It has not taken into account. It is a very old resolution. We do not advance if we are talking about a competition where labor relations do not paint anything. “
Aganzo He insisted that “it was a tacit agreement between the parties. We talked to the players of both teams, who understood the difficulty of the calendar and accepted a minimum agreement of three weeks of vacation (included in the agreement) and three preseason three, assuming that they renounced the four that from the union, at least, we recommended. LaLigaAs a employer, he spoke with the clubs. There was agreement between the parties and we reflected in a letter to LaLiga May 16 “.
Read too
Finally, he pointed out that “they have not respected the agreement and have not taken into account the risk of the players indicated. Since we send our position after several conversations with LaLigaThey have acted unilaterally without taking into account players. We are disappointed because you could work protecting the footballer and for the benefit of the competition. It is not incompatible. I fear that the idea of putting that game on August 19 does not respond precisely to a sports criteria and much less prevention of the footballer. “
