The right seems worried about the physical appearance of Pedro Sánchez. Understand, it is not really worried, but that it considers it a symbol of its agony or that it is possessed by the evil one. On the latter, there are few political doubts. Alberto Núñez Feijóo's reaction to the president's criticism in the TVE interview with the judges investigating his wife and his brother again stepped on the hyperbole accelerator: “This is not democratic anomaly. It is already a danger to Spain.”
The capital letters appear in Feijóo's tweet. The PP needs greater capital letters to reflect what is happening through its head in relation to Sánchez. The concepts used before, such as that of anomaly, used frequently, or to say that democracy threatens, are not enough. They fall short when they see that the guy does not leave Moncloa. It is a danger to Spain. Soon it will be for Europe, the West or the Universe. On the Milky Way, they should already be alarmed.
Sanchez had been interviewing a media outlet for more than a year. That is usually a symptom that things have not either gone to his government or him personally. Politicians lose their appetite for extensive interviews when they are surrounded by bad news. Sanchez did give a press conference at the end of July just before going on vacation.
Only an ignorant would restore importance to the effects of stress on the health and appearance of a person. Sánchez, who is 53 years old, is much thinner than a year ago, beyond that it is not more relevant to compare a photo of him with another of 2018. Seven years leave their mark on anyone.
Some see it almost dead and enraged that you have not agreed to get into a coffin. “The real message It was the face. Tense, macilenta, deteriorated, rough, ”wrote Ignacio Camacho in ABC. He is revealing the times that run the fact that the comments of social networks, and that includes good or bad jokes, end up leaking in the columns of the newspapers and television gatherings. It is not enough to say that it is thinner. Surely he intends to give sorry and that is why Camacho explains that Camacho – When Pepa well asked him for what he said when Rajoy extended the budgets, “because” perhaps the abuse of facial retouching prevents him from doing so. ”
Theodoro Leodoro Gross suggested in the same newspaper: “And this is no makeup that can hide it. There is no Botox that is worth, but neither votes. ”So Sánchez presents a“ deterioration ”aspect, but at the same time it turns out that Botox is put on. It is not necessary to seek a coherent logic in these aesthetic analysis. It is about denouncing evil in all forms, which in Spain seems to have become another way of strengthening liberal democracy.
Everything is in order to denounce an alleged autocracy in which the Government does not even get the legislative to approve a budget project. And that is supposed that autocracy is “The form of government in which the will of a single person is the supreme law. ”
“There are judges doing politics and do immense damage to justice,” said Sánchez in the interview. He has no choice but to affirm that unless he is required to recognize the guilt of Begoña Gómez and David Sánchez. For the PP and some media, it is an intolerable attack on all justice.
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado decided on Wednesday to sign Sánchez's attack with a car in which he claims to Moncloa all emails sent or received by Gomez since 2018. More than a year of instruction and a cluster of imputations have not served him to combed to conclude the instruction and find something where to catch the president's wife. Now he throws the cane again to see if he fishes something, bullowed by the organizations of the extreme right that occupy the popular accusations. The last time he shot in style, aiming at Minister Félix Bolaños, took a good revolcon in the Supreme Court.
Sánchez said those words the same day that the judge of the Dana, Nuria Ruiz Tobarra, denounced the strategy of the defendants of the accused – among them the former counselor of the PP Salome Pradas – to remove it “brightly” from the instruction. There are media that have collaborated in that operation getting to publish suspicions not endorsed with evidence that the husband of the magistrate, who is also a judge, is the one who has written some of his cars.
Neither the PP nor the media scandalized by attacks on some judges have thought it appropriate to raise their voices against the attempt to eliminate a judge with the hope that the substitute will be more benevolent with the defendants and with the management of the Dana by the Government of Mazón. At the moment, there is also no news of the General Council of the Judiciary despite the fact that this story began before the summer.
One of those media that has published photos of the judge and her husband has been OK Diario, obtained in the view room where the statements of witnesses are presumably made by one of the defense lawyers. As a prize for that action and others that have always characterized sensational journalism, Felipe VI granted this Wednesday An audience to the managers of that media, coinciding with its tenth anniversary, headed by its director, Eduardo Inda.
In other appointments related to media, the king has alerted of the danger of misinformation and of a global tendency of “erosion” of informative credibility. In the rugged visit to Paiporta after the Dana, he went to vehement to explain that some of the things that he listened to the people around him were not true: “You do not pay attention to everything that is published because there is a lot of misinformation.” The same must be seen in this way: he said nothing about not receiving those who want to charge the judge of Valencia at home.
