The PP government team puts the table again Urban modification of Vistahermosa Norte, which affects the private hospital that is built in the area. After the public exhibition of the file, validated by the Plenary in February with the votes in favor of PP and Vox, the Urban Planning Commission will address this Monday the resolution of allegations and provisional approval of the change of change of Planning of the APA-9 sector, with an eye on his time through the municipal plenary, which will meet the Thursday July 31. An urban initiative that Go ahead without variationafter technical and legal reports have lying formulated during the public consultation period.
The document promoted by the PP government team contemplates the change of qualification of the M-15 block, on which the new hospital stands, of single -family residential use a Tertiary-special use. An adjustment based on regulations that collects the General Urban Planning Planintroduced by a modification of the year 1987, and that will not only modify the use of the land, but also to increase the buildable and raise a height of the maximum allowed in the plot, up to the four plants.
This procedure already tried to be carried out just a year ago, in July 2024, but which was annulled after the City Council detected irregularities in the construction of the aforementioned hospital. At that time, the municipal executive warned the mercantile promoter of the Anomalies detected the works, which then had been in progress for more than a year and a half. The government team appreciated that the constructed did not adjust to the municipal authorization because the structure, fully completed, already had four plants (apart from basements), while The license of the work, of November 2022, only allowed two heights.
Regularization
The approval of this change in the Planning of the APA-9 sector It involves validating a work that, according to municipal reports, was executed with two more heights of the authorized ones. The construction of the private hospital without the necessary licenses motivated the Opening of two files by the City Council: One sanctioner and another restoration of urban legality. From the government team they indicated last March that the sanction will not be specified until Close urban processing and the degree of infraction. Meanwhile, the normative change progresses.
The proposal also includes a financial compensation of 785,000 euros from the company to the City Council for the increase in buildability derived from the modification. “This buildability increase entails financial compensation by the company for the City Council, which is It will allocate to the municipal land heritage already the one will add the sanction that the responsible company must pay For the urban irregularities committed by executing works outside the license granted in 2022, “the Councilor for Urban Planning, Rocío Gómez, said through a statement.
Rejected allegations
During the period of public exposure, Allegations were presented by the mercantile Vithas Alicante SL., and particular and socialist councilors Ana Barceló y Trini Love. All of them, of which the City Council has not given more details, have been rejected by municipal technicians. The report prepared by the Legal Coordination Headquarters of the Urban Planning Areain coordination with the Planning serviceconcludes that the allegations of Vithas and the individual must be dismissed, and raises the inadmissibility of those made by the councilors.
This inadmissibility is based on the fact that legal services understand that councilors “They do not hold legitimation to present allegations in the public information process”. By understanding that their status as public representatives may formulate amendments during the plenary debate.
“The councilors hold a qualified position with respect to the rest of the neighbors that allow them to challenge in judicial means The agreements adopted, what citizens and legal persons who have not accredited their status as interested, ”cannot do”, The report exposes. To this is added that “They have the other mechanisms attributed by the laws to exercise their right of political representation, under the provisions of article 23 of the Constitution, such as the allegations they may make in the collegiate bodies, as well as the presentation of amendments to the matters that have to submit to the decision of the Plenary and the particular votes”.
However, the document emphasizes that this inadmissibility “It does not leave any of the questions raised uncontrolled”since everything collected in the allegations of the socialist group coincides “In substantial and formal content” With what was stated by the particular A.T.R., whose participation was formally admitted and answered by municipal services.
Subscribe to continue reading
