He CTA The criteria for evaluating the referees and the specific body of OUR in the face of weekly designations and promotions/descents of the end of the season. Meritocracy as an essential principle of the new presidency of Fran Soto.
Thus, in the 100%arbitral global evaluation there will be three sections: Technical Physical Evaluation with 15%, Official Evaluation of the IA with 45%, Evaluation of the TV observes 20%and the evaluation of the Technical Commission 20%.
Within 15% of physical-technical evaluation, physical tests represent 20%, technical tests the same percentage, 20% videos and the remaining 40% of the mandatory training telematic report.
In regards to 45% of the official evaluation of the informant together with the AI; 40% will come from the great novelty of the AI that will perform an “objective evaluation based on statistical data, technical and disciplinary successes, and interventions of the VAR. All valuations will be contrasted and validated by an informant officer.” And the remaining 60% will depend on the report of the arbitration observer delegate that prosecutes technical, disciplinary aspects, party control, positioning, physical condition and management of players and technicians.
This 60% is completed with 20% of the TV evaluation observe: “Independent analysis carried out by a team of 13 analysts that review, analyze and evaluate all the first and second division matches. This team maintains weekly meetings to unify criteria, guaranteeing homogeneity and comparability between the qualifications issued” and a final 20% of the technical commission dating David Fernández Borbalán and that will analyze the performances weekly. arbitral.
The successes and reliability of the VAR are key in their weekly designations
And then there is the evaluation to the VAR group of specific body formed by fifteen members where 55% of the total will depend on the so -called reliability in decision making. It refers to the percentages of success in those intervened actions as well as the success percentages in the checking and confirmation of complexity plays for the analyst and the technical commission. 20% will come from the report evaluation where technical aspects in terms of actions from the vor, management of the EFF (in case of having them) and those relevant actions considered by the analyst Var, within the context of difficulty of the party, will be assessed. Another 5% will come from complementary tests, tests and tests and the final 20% of the evaluation of the Technical Commission and based on capabilities parameters detected in the use of procedures, communication protocols, efficient use of cameras, intervention time …
