Pablo Parra Nothing was kept in his last publisher, in which he approached the painful defeat by 4-0 of the Atlético de Madrid in front of the Paris Saint-Germain. Far from focusing his criticism only on arbitration, Parra harshly questioned the General performance of the rojiblanco team, which he accused of showing himself Without soul, without ideas and without football arguments In a match that leaves many doubts.
Although he acknowledged that the Collegiate Blacksmith He had a bad performance, with significant errors and decisions that favored the Parisian team, Parra was blunt: “I would squeak that when a team has lost 4-0, the main comment is arbitration“For the journalist, it is not enough excuse. Atlético de Madrid showed a worrying lack of character and barely generated danger occasions, especially in a first part where he did not even shoot at the door.
István Kovács en Un partido
He pointed against the sports planning of the club. Parra said there is structural decisions that condition the equipmentsuch as the lack of reinforcements and a template that has not evolved to the rhythm required by the European elite. “He lacked mordant, he lacked football, he lacked everything“he said, making it clear that the problems go far beyond a bad referee.
One of the whites of his criticism was Antoine Griezmannwhose ownership non-negotiable Parra does not understand. “I don't see justification”he said, highlighting that the player is going through a very discreet moment. It is questioned that you have played the 90 minutes complete in a match of Such caliberwhile other players like Sorloth With better scoring numbers they barely had minutes.
Erika Choprena y antoine Griezmann
Along the same lines, he wondered why The Norwegian He did not start in front of the PSG. “With all Goals That has put, why don't you play? “He questioned, suggesting that there are decisions difficult techniques to understandR from outside. Although he acknowledged: “Diego Simeone knows much more football than me“Although it made it clear that there are aspects that do not close.
I would squeak that when a team has lost 4-0, the main comment is arbitration
“There was a lot tactical disorder y absence of resources of the team in key phases of the meeting. “regretted Atlético's little capacity to compete before a Powerful rivalpointing out that players like Julian Simeone became visibly frustrated during the match.
Julián Álvarez in the previous meeting between Atlético de Madrid and PSG
Concluded Insisting that, although arbitration was very bad, the background problem is deeper. “Yes, the referee was wrong, but Atlético de Madrid added another bad game on his scoreboard“He closed with tone criticalcalling an internal reflection urgent In the mattress club.
With this Analysis without filtersit is clear that the Atlético de Madrid It cannot shield Only in arbitration errors. The defeat against the PSG is a sign of alarm that points directly to the structure of the equipment, to its coaching staff already management decisions They need urgent review.
